A Comparison of Pedagogical Challenges Faced byPublic and Private Novice Teachers at PrimaryLevelat Gujrat
Keywords:
Novice teachers, pedagogy, elementary teachers, elementary schoolAbstract
The study aimed to investigate pedagogical challenges faced by novice elementary teachersand their comparison in public and private sector. The main objectives of the study were toexplore the communication challenges faced by novice elementary teachers with students, toassess the challenges faced by novice elementary teachers regarding motivational strategies, to find out the challenges faced by novice elementary teachers related to teaching methods. The population of the study comprised of all girls elementary schools in district Gujarat. One hundred and six teachers were selected by using convenient sampling technique questionnaire was used for data collection. Data was analysed by using mean, standard deviation, one sample t-test and two ways ANOVA. The findings of the study revealed that the communication challenges faced by both private and public novice teachers. Teachers of public and private sectors face challenges in using teaching methods and motivational strategies.
Downloads
References
- Boreen, J. & Niday, D. (2000). Breaking through isolation. Mentoring beginning teachers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44 (2). 152-163. Retrived August 23, 2003, from Academic Search Premier (an3602519).
- Brock, B. L. & Grady M. L. (1998). Beginning teacher induction program: The role of the principal. Clearing House, 71 (3), 179-184. Retrieved August 23, 2003, from Academic Search Premier (an 355793).
Bullough, R. V. Jr. (1989). First year teacher: A case study. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Carmés, R. (2003). Precarización y burnout delpuesto de trabajo del
personaldocente e investigador de la universidad. Revista Praxis, 2, 13- 21. Retrieved May 18, 2004, from: http://www.revistapraxis.
- Carter, M. & Francis, R. (2001). Mentoring and beginning teachers'
workplace learnin Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3),249-261.
- Chenoweth, K. (2009). How it's being done: Urgent lessons from unexpected schools.
- Cambridge,MA: Harvard Education Press. Clearing House, 63 (6), 251-153. Working paper (an 9705100324).
- Drake, C. (2000). Experience counts: Career stage and teachers' responses to
mathematics education reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
- Eckola, J. H. (2007). A case study: the benefits and challenges of first year
teacher induction as perceived by two first year teacher. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI Number:3259717).
- Eilerman, R. J. & Stanley, M. (1994). A collaborative model to help beginning
teachers prepare materials for their first years of teaching. Teaching and Change, 2 (1), 3-14.
- Frieberg, H. J. (2002). Essential skills for new teachers. Educational
Leadership, 59 (6), 56-60. Fry, S. W-y. (2007). Ups, downs, and in-betweens. The Qualitative Report,12(2), 216-237.
- Fry, S. W. (2007). First-year teachers and induction support: Ups, downs, andin-betweens. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 216-237.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
Open Access
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Scholar Insight Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
